![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
Effects of the Winter 2000–2001 Freezes on Common Snook in FloridaNumerous common snook were affected by one of the coldest Florida winters ever recorded.Weather Observations The morning of December 22 brought the first freeze of the winter, with air temperatures of 29° F recorded at Palmetto. Bay waters dropped to 55.8–59° F. Early on December 31st, the air temperature again dropped below freezing and the water temperature in Tampa Bay fell to the critical 54° F. Water temperatures in the shallow flats were as low as 52° F. At this juncture, we expected to receive reports of stunned, dying, and dead snook, especially in the more northern reaches of our area. We solicited the help of fishing guides, park rangers, and outdoor writers to gather accounts of any stressed or dead snook, but no sightings were reported. During the first three days of the new year, overnight air temperatures remained in the mid to low 30s and daytime highs did not exceed 55° F. On the morning of January 5th, the air temperature at Palmetto dropped to 28° F and remained below freezing for about seven hours. The freeze dropped bay water temperatures to 49.1–50.2° F across Pinellas and Manatee Counties. Reports of stunned, dying, and dead snook began to come in. Field Observations January 5, 2001 We then went to Bishop's Harbor and searched the entire bay. We found snook only in the canals along the southeast shore near the ramp. In the first canal, there were about 500 live snook that appeared to be in better shape than those in the Port. However, we found more snook dead here than in the Port and collected about 25 for aging studies. Water temperatures in the first canal were 53.9° F at the surface and 53.6° F at the bottom. In the second canal we found another 300 to 500 live snook in similar condition to those in the first canal and we recorded similar water-temperature readings. We collected another ten dead snook here. We then went into the adjoining creeks thinking we would find dead fish that had been trapped in these shallow areas, but we didn't find any. Two suppositions are apparent from this trip: 1) If water temperatures drop gradually, snook leave the shallow flats for deeper water and appear to become acclimated to colder temperatures. The minimum of 54° F is reported to be the lethal low, but we found snook alive and doing well in 50–51° F water this winter. 2) Following periods of extreme cold, snook come to the surface to benefit from the warmth of the sun. Almost all the snook we saw were in sunny, quiet, protected areas. January 7, 2001 January 9, 2001 We walked the shorelines around Bayboro Harbor, Weedon Island and Bishop's Harbor. There were still hundreds of lethargic snook milling at the surface in sunny, sheltered coves. Forty to 50 percent had patches of fungal and bacterial infections and frayed bloodshot fins, however they were responsive and actively moved off as we came into view or caused a shadow to pass over them. We did not locate any dead snook still floating in the bay; though, there were several hundred decaying and half-eaten carcasses along the shoreline. Estimates of Fatalities
Atlantic Coast
Date Area Number of Fatalities
1/2/01 Mosquito Impoundment 50
1/4/01 Mosquito Impoundment 30
1/4/01 New Smyrna 500
1/5/01 Sebastian 100
1/9/01 Daytona 40
1/9/01 Melbourne 25
1/13/01 Oak Hill 1
Total–746
Gulf Coast
Date Area Number of Fatalities
1/3/01 Estero 20
1/4/01 Clearwater 30
1/4/01 Manatee River 4
1/4/01 MacDill 1
1/5/01 Lowry Park 1
1/5/01 Port Manatee 200
1/5/01 Bishop's Harbor 300
1/5/01 SERF 20
1/7/01 Clearwater 54
1/8/01 Cockroach Bay 50
1/8/01 Dunedin 30
1/11/01 Peace River 400
1/12/01 Myakka River 150
1/16/01 Palma Sola 100
1/17/01 Simmon's Park 100
1/17/01 Fort DeSoto 30
1/19/01 St. Joe Sound 10
1/23/01 Pinellas Point 60
1/23/01 Tarpon Springs 100
Total–1660
It is difficult to arrive at a final estimate of snook killed by the 2000–2001 winter freezes because of lag-time between the actual freeze and when fish are discovered and reported. Additionally some dead snook are never counted because they sink from view, float away with the tides and winds, or are eaten by scavengers like raccoons, buzzards, gulls, and ospreys. Thus the estimates above are minimum numbers. If we assume that roughly an equivalent number of dead snook were lost to observation as were counted, then the best estimate of snook killed this past winter is about 1,500 snook on the Atlantic coast and about 3,300 on the gulf coast, or about 5,000 for a statewide total. Two weather conditions kept the mortality from being higher than it was. First,the initial freeze of the winter was not a sudden drop in temperature but was preceded by days of gradual cooling that allowed the snook to acclimate. Second, the days following a freeze event were usually sunny, allowing some cold-stunned fish to recuperate. Comparison to Past Losses from Winter Freezes Condition of the Fish and Fishery
Fig. 1. Length-frequencies of common snook killed in Florida during the winter of 2000–2001. The prediction for 2001 is that snook stocks on both coasts will be robust. Reports persist of reduced numbers of large (> 34") snook in the Charlotte Harbor area, but there are indications that the stock in Charlotte Harbor contains as many, if not more, larger snook than does the Tampa Bay stock. We measured 161 cold-killed snook from Charlotte Harbor and compared them to 222 on the Atlantic coast and 61 from Tampa Bay. We found that about 30% of the fish in Charlotte Harbor were larger than 26", while only 11% on the Atlantic coast and 13% in Tampa Bay were 26" or larger (Fig. 1). Moreover, the comparison between snook in Charlotte Harbor and Tampa Bay is a straightforward one because the two estuaries are much alike. Both are large, open systems, and both have deep areas that snook can use for a thermal refuge. Freezes do not selectively kill either larger or smaller snook. Many of the snook killed on the Atlantic coast were the younger, smaller individuals only because they had entered mosquito-control structures as juveniles and had become trapped in these shallow impoundments. When water temperatures dropped, they could not retreat to the thermal protection of deeper, warmer waters. Future Considerations |
||||||||||
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5020 PH: 727-896-8626 |
|
Mission Statement Advertising Statement and FWC Web Site Disclaimer Developed & Hosted by DataGlyphics, Inc. |